Which is more dangerous: Soft drinks or sugar-free soda?

Browse By

Soft drinks that are fortified with minerals and vitamins do not provide the health benefits that are advertised. For most people, there is no need to get additional minerals or vitamins from soft drinks. The nutrients that manufacturers add are often not nutrients. That the body does not get enough from food, such as calcium, vitamin D, folate, or potassium.UFABET  

Whether drinking soft drinks with artificial sweeteners is less harmful to health than soft drinks with sugar is still unclear. Although sugar-free drinks seem to help reduce the risk of obesity and diabetes. There are only a few studies that support this assumption. In addition, a 2008 study found that people who drank just one can of sugar-free drink. A day had a higher risk of developing abdominal obesity, being overweight, and having high blood sugar levels. All of which can eventually lead to diabetes.

Another 2012 study divided obese teenagers into two groups: one group drank their usual sugary soda, while the other group switched to a sugar-free soda. After one year, the group that drank the sugar-free soda lost a little weight, but after two years, there was no significant difference in weight between the two groups.

However, studies on sugar-free soft drinks often do not consider the other foods that people who drink sugar-free drinks also eat. This is because drinking sugar-free soft drinks but eating a healthy diet is different from people. Who drink this type of soft drink and believe that they can eat more fried or high-fat foods because they have already drunk the calorie-free, sugar-free drink. This latter group is at risk of obesity and other health problems.